Thursday, Nov 18, 2010
Keynote Speaker Christopher Heaney thrilled students with the story of adventurer archaeologist Hiram Bingham and his search for Mach Picchu.
by Sean Ramsden
Like many who grew up in the 1980s, Christopher Heaney was captivated by the daring archaeologist-turned-adventurer Indiana Jones, an idealized Hollywood hero who repeatedly cheated death in the Amazon in order to bring his ancient loot back to the United States in the 1981 film Raiders of the Lost Ark.
As Heaney matured, however, he realized that the Indiana Jones legend also had some basis in fact. Indy鈥檚 real-life model, as it were, is the subject of Heaney鈥檚 book, Cradle of Gold: The Story of Hiram Bingham, a Real-Life Indiana Jones and the Search for Machu Picchu. Heaney, a Harrington Doctoral Fellow at the University of Texas-Austin, spoke to a capacity audience in Sweigart Auditorium on November 11 as the keynote speaker for International Week at 小优视频.
Bingham, who had been to Chile as a delegate to the First Pan American Scientific Congress in 1908, was taken to Choquequirao 鈥 the Cradle of Gold 鈥 on his way back to the United States, and was enchanted by what he saw and learned there.
鈥淚t was the last city of the Incas,鈥 said Heaney of the mountainside development to which the tribe retreated in 1572 after 40 years of fighting the Spanish Conquistadors, marking the end of the Incas鈥 political era. 鈥淏ingham loved this story, and tried his best to expand North America鈥檚 understanding of the Incas鈥 story and culture.鈥
It set Bingham 鈥 like Heaney, a baccalaureate graduate of Yale University 鈥 back to Peru in search of the lost city of Machu Picchu, a place heretofore unknown to most of the world beyond its borders. By the spring of 1911, he had secured funding from Yale and reached his destination by the end of July. In return for footing the bill, Yale would take possession of Bingham鈥檚 findings for its own collection.
Bingham鈥檚 subsequent excavations of Incan artifacts yielded much in the way of museum-quality findings, at a time when universities were in competition to develop their collections. It also yielded a controversy that persists today, regarding ownership of the artifacts.
The government of Peru objected to what it considered looting of its national treasures, explained Heaney, before being reassured about the mission by U.S. President William Howard Taft, who promised several concessions.
鈥淯nder the agreement, Yale would get half of the artifacts,鈥 Heaney said, adding that there were also concerns in Peru that a colonial relationship was developing. 鈥淚ntellectuals in Lima could not understand the agreement, however, and asked how Peruvians would study artifacts when half of them were going to New Haven.鈥
From this, Bingham unilaterally cut a another deal with the Peruvian government that seemed to favor the South American nation.
鈥淎ll of the artifacts would go to Yale, but Peru could call back the collection anytime,鈥 said Heaney, who also explained that at the time, nations the world over were being shamelessly looted by explorers representing academia across the United States and Europe. 鈥淭he media in Peru exclaimed that they had 鈥榗hanged the system.鈥欌
Except that Bingham never told Yale about the agreement. In 1920, a letter arrived in New Haven from Peru, requesting the return of the artifacts 鈥 plenty of bronzework and silver, but primarily human remains taken from the mountainside of Machu Picchu. Needless to say, the correspondence came to the surprise of the Ivy League university.
鈥淏ingham was embarrassed of the arrangement, and never mentioned it back at Yale,鈥 Heaney explained. 鈥淗e simply said that Peru has negotiated in bad faith. It had a lasting effect on the reputations of both Bingham and Yale in Peru from the 1920s on.鈥
Indeed, even at this year鈥檚 New York Marathon, nine Peruvian participants competed in shirts that said, 鈥淵ale, give the artifacts back,鈥 Heaney said.
Regardless of his questionable dealings, Americans fell for tales of Bingham鈥檚 daring in this mysteriously exotic land, as detailed in various periodicals. Even years later, his book, Lost City of the Incas, landed Bingham on the bestsellers list in 1948.
If anything, the book reignited the public鈥檚 interest in Bingham, his exploits, and the search for Machu Picchu. The 1953 film Secret of the Incas, starring Charlton Heston, bore some striking similarities to Bingham鈥檚 story, according to Heaney.
鈥淚t involved a grifter who goes to Machu Picchu and find a vaunted 鈥榮un disk,鈥 which the natives had been searching for over many years,鈥 Heaney said. 鈥淏efore he could take it back to the United States, he has an attack of conscience and gave it back. The producers came up with the idea after reading Bingham鈥檚 articles.鈥
Heaney explained how the Heston character really provides a missing link from Bingham to the more contemporary Indiana Jones. However, with each incarnation, more and more truth is sacrificed to Hollywood-style drama.
鈥淭hink of a paper-copy machine,鈥 explained Heaney. 鈥淚f you kept making copies off of previous copies, each generation comes out with less and less detail.鈥
Though Bingham was a respected academic and archaeologist, the successive incarnations of his legend may lead one to believe that he was more of a shameless plunderer. Not so, says Heaney, who described the scene, near the beginning of Raiders of the Lost Ark, where Jones escapes with his golden bounty as the temple implodes just behind him.
鈥淭o an archaeologist, whoever destroyed a place he was studying would be kicked out of the profession,鈥 said Heaney, who admitted that even Bingham certainly could have moved more tactfully through Peru 鈥 a place he genuinely loved 鈥 if his focus wasn鈥檛 sometimes blurred by his ambition. 鈥淲e can find our own artifacts, but sometimes, we need to tread a bit more lightly.
鈥淭his became a sad story, but it began very positively as a story of cooperation,鈥 he said.